Shamanic Practice as Adversarial Performance

Stage 1 of 8

Shamanic Practice as Adversarial Performance

A Control-Theoretic Framework

Shamanic practice has never been studied from inside the system while simultaneously generating a rigorous theoretical account of what is occurring. The field of shamanic studies has produced rich ethnographic documentation and phenomenological testimony. The field of performance science has developed precise accounts of self-regulation under adversarial conditions in sport and music. But the intersection—a control-theoretic model of the practitioner's perceptual and regulatory experience as it unfolds in shamanic practice—has remained unmapped. The Unmapped Interior occupies that intersection. It extends the Control Loop Framework into a performance domain where the adversarial forces are not external opponents but reorganized perceptual fields, where feedback is structurally ambiguous, and where the practitioner's reference signal architecture is itself the object of deliberate alteration. This is not a reduction of shamanic practice to neuroscience. It is not a dismissal of its cosmological claims. It is the identification of shamanic practice's control-theoretic architecture with sufficient precision to make development within it measurable. The question is simple: if shamanic practice can be shown to follow a control-theoretic developmental trajectory analogous to that documented in adversarial athletic performance, what does that reveal about the generality of CLF constructs and the performance science framework from which they derive?

Key Concepts